Organic Consumers Association

Sign Today! GMO Animals Should Be Regulated!

GMO animals? image of pigletRecombinetics, Inc., the Monsanto of the genetically modified animal industry, wants to be able to introduce GMO pigs into the U.S. food supply, without having to go through any regulatory process or safety testing.

And the St. Paul, Minn.-based biotech company has come up with a plan it hopes will allow it to do just that.

TAKE ACTION: Tell the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): Genetically modified animals need to be thoroughly safety tested by the FDA!

Please fill out the form on this page to sign our petition, then, share this tweet.

Ever heard of a chimera? In Greek mythology, it was a fire-breathing she-monster with a lion's head, a goat's body and a serpent's tail.

In the age of modern biotechnology, a chimera is an animal with the cells of two different types of organisms.

The chimera envisioned by Recombinetics is a pig that is used as an “oincubator” to grow human body parts for transplant.

Recombinetics is also working to create animals that are better suited to the perils of life in factory farms, like pigs that won’t get porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). Or pigs that don’t have to be castrated or have their tails cut off. Recombinetics also sees a future where cattle are genetically engineered to be heat-tolerant and have increased muscle mass.

So far, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) hasn’t given any of Recombinetics’ products a pass. The agency refused to grant Recombinetics’ request for “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) status for its hornless cows.

Instead, in the final days of the Obama Administration, the FDA said it would regulate all “animals with intentionally altered genomic DNA” as animal drugs, just as it had regulated AquAdvantage GMO salmon.

Recombinetics went ballistic. Scott Fahrenkrug, chief scientific officer, said that the FDA had “gone off the rails.”

The company went on the offense. Recombinetics hired factory farm lobbyist (and organic hater) Steve Kopperud of SLK Strategies to see if it could cash in on the Trump administration’s quest to deregulate everything in sight.

Recombinetics began by getting 79 members of the House of Representatives to write a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Sonny Perdue opposing the FDA’s guidance on regulating any animal intentionally altered using gene-editing techniques as a "new animal drug."

Pretty soon, the USDA had scrapped new Obama Administration rules that would have expanded regulation of gene-edited plants. Trump told the American Farm Bureau Federation, “We are streamlining regulations that have blocked cutting-edge biotechnology, setting free our farmers to innovate, thrive and to grow.”

Most recently, Perdue announced that he had no plans to regulate gene-edited plants “that could otherwise have been developed through traditional breeding techniques as long as they are not plant pests or developed using plant pests.”

Then, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing where legislators made the case for transferring control of gene-edited animals from the FDA to the USDA. At the hearing, Perdue told lawmakers that the USDA would “love to have that responsibility.”

Recombinetics would, too—because the USDA doesn’t have any kind of regulatory process that it could use to review gene-edited food animals.

If Recombinetics’ plan succeeds in ending FDA review of GMO animals, this would be the most drastic deregulation of biotechnology to date.

TAKE ACTION: Tell the USDA: Genetically modified animals need to be thoroughly safety tested by the FDA!

1-25 of 28032 signatures
Number Date Name Comments (optional)
28032 4 hours ago pat Goerndt
28031 10 hours ago U.S EActivist
28030 11 hours ago anissa Sargent You and your money grubbing ilk sicken me, you are going to be the death of humankind playing with our seeds and animals, for what money? Then when you have all the money and no clean water or soil?...
28029 13 hours ago Marina Vrouvlianis
28028 14 hours ago Robert Lawrence
28027 15 hours ago Anonymous This needs to be regulated! My personal opinion is that there should be NO GMO's period!! They are slowly killing us!!!
28026 15 hours ago Paula Betz
28025 16 hours ago Susan Clifford
28024 17 hours ago Aaron Cross
28023 18 hours ago Michael Yannell
28022 21 hours ago Jan Kleckler
28021 24 hours ago Joseph Slaven
28020 24 hours ago Nancy Hall
28019 1 day ago Denis Farley Why don’t the creators of the organism, test it on themselves for a couple of generations and when we see how that works out then we can begin an evaluation.
28018 1 day ago Kent Casady
28017 1 day ago Pamela Harris
28016 1 day ago Sally Sheck
28015 1 day ago Diane Williams
28014 1 day ago Diana Peterlin GMO is demonstrating destructive outcomes. There is nothing positive about anything GMO. Ban it.
28013 1 day ago Angela Zehava
28012 1 day ago Marketa Anderson GMO animals are a terrible idea. Don’t mess with Mother Nature
28011 1 day ago Joanie Murphy
28010 1 day ago Lance Somers
28009 1 day ago Lance Somers
28008 1 day ago Scott Bell
Next ->
Your street address*
123 Street Name
ZIP code (5 digits)*